Drawing for THE WEB BROWSER

USPTO serial 78125912

THE WEB BROWSER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WEB BROWSER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIRK D. HOUSER

KIRK D HOUSER ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COMPUTER SERVER SEARCH ENGINES, EXCLUDING A WEB BROWSER, FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 18, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 17, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 17, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 7, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 8, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 24, 2003GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance