Drawing for PILLAR DATA SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78125931

PILLAR DATA SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILLAR DATA SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James S. Blank

JAMES S BLANK LATHAM & WATKINS885 3RD AVE STE 1000NEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for electronic storage of dataACTIVE—
037Installation, repairs and maintenance of computer hardware for electronic storage of dataACTIVE—
041Training in the use and operation of computer software for electronic storage of dataACTIVE—
042Technical support services, namely troubleshooting of problems with computer hardware and software for electronic storage of data; design for others of computer hardware and software for electronic storage of data; testing and installation of others of computer software for electronic storage of data; and consulting services in relation thereto; and research and development services in the field of computer hardware and software for electronic storage of dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance