USPTO serial 78126099
LEGALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEGALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melbourne, AU
Melbourne, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yano L. Rubinstein
BRIAN R COLEMAN PERKINS COIE, LLP101 JEFFERSON DRMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS BY MEANS OF STORING A ND CATALOGUING LEGAL AND BUSINESS DOCUMENTS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED, INTERROGATED AND SEARCHED; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS; ELECTRONIC DIARY FOR ENTERING AND STORING KEY DATES TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ELECTRONIC REMINDER GENERATION SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC REMINDER DIARY FOR ENTERING AND STORING KEY DATES THAT CAN GENERATE RECORDS AND CHECKLISTS OF KEY DATES EMAIL; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS BY MEANS STORING AND CATALOGUING LEGAL AND BUSINESS DOCUMENTS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED, INTERROGATED AND SEARCHED | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |