USPTO serial 78126126
BIOREGENESIS AYURVEDA COMPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOREGENESIS AYURVEDA COMPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-shave lotions, After-sun lotions, Anti-aging cream, Anti-bacterial soap, Aromatherapy oils, Astringents for cosmetics purposes, Baby oil, Bath beads, Bath crystals, Bath foam, Bath gels, Bath oil, Beauty masks, Blush, Body concealers, Body emulsions, Body masks, Body oil, Body scrubs, Creams for cellulite reduction, Deodorants and antiperspirants, Essential oils for personal use, Essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products, namely, scented oils, Eye cream, Eye gels, Eye makeup, Eyebrow pencils, Facial scrubs, Foot deodorant spray, Foundation makeup, Hair care preparations, Hand cream, Incense, Lip liner, Lipstick, Lotions for cellulite reduction, Makeup, Mascara, Massage oil, Mouthwash, Nail cream, Non-medicated bath salts, Non-medicated lip balm, Perfume oils, Pumice stones for personal use, Room fragrances, Scented body scented body spray, Shampoo-conditioners, Shaving Balm, Shaving Cream, Shaving preparations, Shower gel, Skin concealers, Skin conditioners, Skin moisturizer, Skin toners, Sun screen, Sun tanning preparations, Tooth gel, Tooth paste, Tooth polish, tooth powders | ACTIVE | Jan 6, 2003 |
| 005 | Food, dietary, herbal nutritional, vitamin and mineral supplements; Herbal teas for medicinal purposes | ACTIVE | Jan 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |