Drawing for 3 MUSKETEERS THE MUSICAL

USPTO serial 78126154

3 MUSKETEERS THE MUSICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3 MUSKETEERS THE MUSICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman, James P. Ryther, Monica L. Thompson, Keith W. Medansky, Christina L. Martini, Linda Urbanik Johnson, Thomas W. Ryan, Myla Barefield Young, Micah R. Onixt, Gina L. Durham and Jennifer J. Baumann

MARK I FELDMAN, CHRISTINA L MARTINI AN DLA PIPER US LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images, namely, compact disc players, portable compact disc players, video recorders, television sets, and camcorders; blank magnetic data carriers, blank compact discs, blank video tapes, and blank laser discs and DVDs; pre-recorded compact discs, pre-recorded magnetic data carriers, pre-recorded video tapes; prerecorded laser discs, prerecorded DVDs and CDIs, all featuring music, characters, scenes and situations relating to a television series, as well as music, scenes, characters and situations from an internet site related to a television series; computer games recorded on CD-ROMACTIVE—
041Educational and enterntainment services, namely, production of television programs, motion film production, theater production such as stage productions and productions of musicalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 21, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance