USPTO serial 78126154
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Feldman, James P. Ryther, Monica L. Thompson, Keith W. Medansky, Christina L. Martini, Linda Urbanik Johnson, Thomas W. Ryan, Myla Barefield Young, Micah R. Onixt, Gina L. Durham and Jennifer J. Baumann
MARK I FELDMAN, CHRISTINA L MARTINI AN DLA PIPER US LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images, namely, compact disc players, portable compact disc players, video recorders, television sets, and camcorders; blank magnetic data carriers, blank compact discs, blank video tapes, and blank laser discs and DVDs; pre-recorded compact discs, pre-recorded magnetic data carriers, pre-recorded video tapes; prerecorded laser discs, prerecorded DVDs and CDIs, all featuring music, characters, scenes and situations relating to a television series, as well as music, scenes, characters and situations from an internet site related to a television series; computer games recorded on CD-ROM | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational and enterntainment services, namely, production of television programs, motion film production, theater production such as stage productions and productions of musicals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |