USPTO serial 78126473
SOFTCORP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFTCORP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mallard Technical Services, Inc.
Riverside, CA
Mallard Technical Services, Inc.
Riverside, CA
SOFTWARE CORPORATION (SOFTCORP)
RIVERSIDE, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOUSE MARK FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE NAMELY BUSINESS APPLICATION SOFTWARE, HOME AND PERSONAL APPLICATION SOFTWARE, INFORMATION, DATA, COMPUTER, AND STORAGE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOL SOFTWARE, COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEM MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION SOFTWARE, COMPUTER UTILITY SOFTWARE, AND NETWORK AND COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE, AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mallard Technical Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mallard Technical Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTWARE CORPORATION (SOFTCORP)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SOFTCORP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |