USPTO serial 78126769
PRESS PARTNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRESS PARTNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Hartland, CT
East Hartland, CT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Equipment for handling and feeding materials to metal working presses, namely, reels, feeders, and conveyors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |