USPTO serial 78126809
INTESTINOMICINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2863591Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2004
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTESTINOMICINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LABORATORIOS LOPEZ, S.A. DE C.V.
SAN SALVADOR, SV
Springfield, VA
Springfield, VA
Springfield, VA
SPRINGFIELD, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker Holley & Menker, P.A.PO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, LOPERAMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIARRHEA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LABORATORIOS LOPEZ, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Belcastro, Jamie
- Other trademarks owned by Belcastro, Jamie
- Other trademarks owned by Belcastro, Jamie
- Other trademarks owned by BELMORA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named INTESTINOMICINA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |