USPTO serial 78126914
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER J.RIEBLING, ESQ.
JOSEPH S WU ARTER & HADDEN LLP16TH FL550 W CTR STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3568| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, informational posters pertaining to employment and labor laws, and workplace safety | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |