Drawing for PATTI

USPTO serial 78126947

PATTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing personnel attendance and tracking services, namely, prompt notification of call-outs and lateness for on-premise employees and the tracking off-premise employees, including but not limited to independent contractors and sales representatives, enabling employers to facilitate the invoicing of time and expenses for such employees via the Internet, telephone and interactive voice response systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 16, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 16, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 2, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 11, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Apr 11, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Feb 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 17, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 26, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 5, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 4, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance