USPTO serial 78127298
NEOPHOTONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3303309Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEOPHOTONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mikio Ishimaru
Mikio Ishimaru ISHIMARU & ASSOCIATES LLP2055 GATEWAY PLACE, SUITE 700SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electro-optical devices for use in or with communications systems, namely, audio, video and data transmitters, audio, video and data receivers, optical connectors, optical adapters, optical filters, optical switches, terminators, laser resonators, lasers not for medical use, optical waveguides, multiplexors, optical fibers, optical splitters, optical couplers, isolators, graphic equalizers, circulators, signal regenerators, optical cross-connects, routers, amplifiers, optical detectors, optical fiber cables, optical modulators, waveguide phase-shifters, and assembled combinations thereof; optical preforms for use in manufacturing optical fiber cables, optical films for use in light handling devices, optical fibers, optical waveguides; and optical network devices, namely, lasers not for medical use, optical detectors, fiber optic cables, laser resonators, optical modulators, optical connectors, optical switches, multiplexers, routers, optical filters, waveguide phase-shifters, amplifiers, optical couplers, optical splitters, isolators, optical equalizers, circulators, signal regenerators, optical cross-connects, optical adapters, terminators, laser resonators, optical waveguides, and assembled combinations thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 11, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |