Drawing for NOURISH THE CHILDREN

USPTO serial 78127373

NOURISH THE CHILDREN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOURISH THE CHILDREN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew V. Parker

MATTHEW V PARKER FIRST HARVEST INTERNATIONAL LLC75 W CTR STPROVO, UT 84601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products, namely partially prepared and packaged mixtures of soups and entrees containing preserved, cooked and dehydrated meats, vegetables and/or soy proteinsACTIVEMay 17, 2002
030Food products, namely prepared and packaged mixtures and entrees consisting primarily of flour, rice or other grains; prepared and packaged mixtures and entrees consisting primarily of bread or cerealsACTIVEMay 17, 2002
035Facilitating the donation of food products by consumers to not-for-profit organizations through direct selling retail merchandisingACTIVEMay 17, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Aug 26, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Mar 15, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 5, 2003FAXXFAX SENT
May 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 9, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 9, 2003EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance