USPTO serial 78127414
SPANGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPANGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy L. Boldt
WENDY L BOLDT COHEN BLACKWELL SANDERS PEPER MARTIN LLP720 OLIVE ST 24TH FLSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath Beads, Bath Crystals, Bath Foam, Bath Gel, Bath Oil, Bath Pearls, Bath Powder, and non-medicated Bath Salts; Body Cream, Body Glitter, Body Lotion, Body Oil, Body Powder and Body Scrubs; Eye Cream, Eye Gel and Eye Shadow; Face Cream, Face Lotion, Face Mask, Face Powder, Face Toner, Facial Emulsions, Facial Glitter, Facial Scrubs, Blush, Lip Balm, Lip Gloss and Lip Lotion; Hair Conditioner, Hair Gel, Hair Glitter, Hair Mascara and Hair Shampoo; Cuticle Conditioner, Cuticle Cream, Hand Cream, Hand Lotion, Nail Cream and Nail Polish; Antibacterial Soap, Skin Cleansing Creams, Skin Cleansing Lotions, Skin Cream, Skin Lotions, Skin Moisturizers, Skin Soap, Skin Texturizers and Skin Toners; Massage Oil and Essential Oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |