Drawing for NETP

USPTO serial 78127641

NETP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NETP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric D. Paulsrud

ERIC D PAULSRUD LEONARD, ST AND DEINARD150 S 5TH STSTE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer search engine software for helping people find news, information, products, and services they are, or may become interested in; computer software for analyzing customer data for use in industry, namely, analyzing user's transaction data that includes purchase history, product hierarchy, descriptions, telephone sales data, field sales data, mail-in data, and e-commerce transactions data for users in the fields of retail and industry to provide the user with descriptive statistics, customer count, product count, average order size, total sales by product, total sales by category, best-selling products and most often purchased products and to create incremental demand for new sales by drawing on existing customer, product and transaction data to identify the best product recommendations targeted for each customer, or to find the best of the user's customers for each product; computer software for use in analyzing customer data in the fields of sales, advertising, marketing, and electronic commerce; computer software namely, real-time computer recommendation search engine software; computer software for use in database management in the fields of advertising, marketing, and electronic commerce; computer software for use in tracking and analyzing market research data related to consumer preferences to make recommendations on marketing strategies; computer software for tracking and analyzing online transaction data for targeting advertisements and promotions to the interests and tastes of specific individuals or groups; computer operating programs for managing and operating call centers and contact centers; computer software for use in analyzing market research data pertaining to consumer preferences to make recommendations of products or services for sale to reflect preferences and tastes of individual customers and/or groups of customers; computer software for use in analyzing market research data in order to predict the demand of specific products or services; computer software for use in analyzing market research data to identify potential customers or groups of potential customers for particular products or services; computer software for use in designing and creating catalogs, catalog inserts, and direct mail pieces; computer software for use in analyzing market research data to recommend products to customers in stores, computer software for analyzing market research data to recommend products in in-store kiosks, or at cash registers or other point-of-sale terminals; computer software for analyzing market research data to recommend coupons to be printed or presented to customers based on their preferences; downloadable business enterprise computer software for use on a computer network allowing creation of, and access to, a knowledge repository of business information and documents by the user and which includes a search engine for accessing the business information in the repository, a recommendation engine for suggesting relevant documents to users based on others use of documents in the system, a means for connecting users of the software with each other based on their patterns of use of the software and information, a means of importation of the business information and documents and a user interfaceACTIVEMay 19, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 10, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 10, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 21, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 21, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 21, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 13, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance