Drawing for ECOMMUNIQUE

USPTO serial 78128011

ECOMMUNIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOMMUNIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software platforms for Internet marketing, including e-mail marketing, Internet surveys and Internet proposalsACTIVEFeb 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Sep 10, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 25, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Jun 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
May 16, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance