USPTO serial 78128081
XEBEC MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XEBEC MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Eisen
STEVEN J EISEN BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN & CALDWELLCOMMERCE CTR STE 1000211 COMMERCE STNASHVILLE, TN 37201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services, namely, providing comprehensive business management consulting services, human resource consulting services, and serving as a human resources department for others | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 25, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |