USPTO serial 78128572
XILEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XILEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven H. Hartman
MARIE V DRISCOLL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISORDERS OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, THE IMMUNE SYSTEM, THE CARDIO-VASCULAR SYSTEM, THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM, THE MUSCULO-SKELETAL SYSTEM, FOR THE TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISORDERS, FOR THE TREATMENT OF SKIN DISORDERS, FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER, AND FOR THE TREATMENT OF EYE DISORDERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |