USPTO serial 78128615
SMARTPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Weinstein, Esq.
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLPWORLD TRADE CTR155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines that apply security elements to paper securities, namely bank notes, through engraving, heat transfer or other application process | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | anti-counterfeiting computer software programs for producing optically variable elements on paper securities, namely bank notes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |