Drawing for BIGDOG

USPTO serial 78128664

BIGDOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIGDOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW KRIGBAUM

MATTHEW KRIGBAUM MOYER & BERGMAN, PLC2720 FIRST AVE NECEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power operated high clearance self-propelled sprayer for use in the agricultural industryABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 2, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 2, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 2, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 2, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Aug 12, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 24, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 30, 2002PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance