USPTO serial 78128709
EQUALCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EQUALCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CORAL GABLES, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A GAST
DAVID A GAST MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING VOICE-OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL SERVICES, FAX OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL SERVICES, AND VIDEO OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS GATEWAY SERVICES USING INTERNET PROTOCOL BACKBONE; LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |