USPTO serial 78128874
RAPIDRCFIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2849275Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 2004
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAPIDRCFIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAULA D. HEYMAN
PAULA D HEYMAN BAKER BOTTS LLP98 SAN JACINTO BLVD STE 1500AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DESIGN AUTOMATION SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DESIGNING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, NAMELY FOR USE IN AUTOMATICALLY ELIMINATING DESIGN RULE VIOLATIONS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2006 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |