USPTO serial 78128888
INMEDIATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3291433Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2007
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INMEDIATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
San Juan, PR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
Christine M. Baker Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo, PC666 Third Avenue, 24th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROCESSING, TRACKING, ANALYZING AND MANAGING ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS IN THE HEALTH CARE FIELD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 11, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |