USPTO serial 78128901
EHD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3090866Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EHD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
Concord, NH
Other trademarks owned by The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
Concord, NH
Other trademarks owned by The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
Concord, NH
Other trademarks owned by The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Spear
JEFFREY SPEAR ORR & RENOONE EAGLE SQCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely books, brochures, pamphlets and posters on the topic of human prenatal development and the dangers of drug and substance abuse during pregnancy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 19, 2005 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY SEMINARS AND LECTURES IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE DANGERS OF DRUG AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE DURING PREGNANCY, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; DEVELOPMENT AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE DANGERS OF DRUG AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE DURING PREGNANCY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 19, 2005 |
| 044 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE DANGERS OF DRUG AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE DURING PREGNANCY VIA THE INTERNET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 19, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Endowment for Human Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named EHD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 1, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |