Drawing for WWE

USPTO serial 78128935

WWE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WWE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen

LAUREN A DIENES-MIDDLEN WORLD WRESTLING FEDERATION ENTERTAINMENT1241 E MAIN STSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toy action figures and accessories; cases for action figures; toy vehicles; board games; toy spinning tops; arcade games related to wrestling; pinball games related to wrestling; hand-held units for playing electronic game; tabletop action skill games related to wrestling; jigsaw puzzles; kites; toy wrestling rings; dolls; puppets; stuffed toy animals; card games; toy guitars; water guns; vinyl pool products for playing, namely-- pillow back lounge chair; one and two-man inflatable boats; toy boats; rafts; inner tubes for aquatic recreational use; and foot pumps for inflating sports equipment, namely, basketballs, footballs; Christmas tree decorations; costume masks; toy belts, doll furniture; party favors in the nature of crackers and noisemakers; skateboards; bowling balls and accessories, namely, wrist bands, bowling gloves, ball cleaning kits, wrist supports, bowling ball bags; windup toys; toy scooters; bowling pins; knee and elbow pads; walkie talkies; yo-yo's; face painting sets; plastic model kits; pool cues; gum machines; mechanical toy candy bowl dispensers; toy stick gum dispensers; toy molds for making figures out of gumACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 2, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 16, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 1, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance