USPTO serial 78129337
RED DOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED DOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, W11 2XD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger Donley
ROGER DONLEY BAKER BOTTS LLP910 LOUISIANAHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, AND GOODS MADE OF THESE MATERIALS AND NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, NAMELY, LUGGAGE, SUITCASES, GYM BAGS, ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, TOTE BAGS, BEACH BAGS, BOOK BAGS, SHOPPING BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, TRAVELLING BAGS, HANDBAGS; BAGS; WALLETS; PURSES; SHOULDER BAGS; TOILETRY AND COSMETIC BAGS; BRIEF CASES; STACHELS AND PORTFOLIOS; CASES FOR PERSONAL ORGANIZERS; HOLDALLS; ANIMAL SKINS; HIDES; TRUNKS AND TRAVELLING BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |