USPTO serial 78129372
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Ganz
BRADLEY M GANZ GANZ LAW PCPO BOX 2200HILLSBORO, OR 97123UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee based beverages containing milk, rice milk, soya milk or other dairy free alternatives to milk; flavoured ices, flavouring syrups, liquids and powdered mixes used to make coffee, cocoa, or chocolate based beverages; ice cream; sorbets; frozen confections | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |