USPTO serial 78129675
THE TIGGLER THE ORIGINAL VIBRATING BARBELL POWERED BY A TINY DYNAMO TIGGLER HITS THE SPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE TIGGLER THE ORIGINAL VIBRATING BARBELL POWERED BY A TINY DYNAMO TIGGLER HITS THE SPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY, NAMELY, VIBRATING BODY JEWELRY, NON-VIBRATING BODY JEWELRY, BRACELETS, NECKLACES, EARRINGS, CHARMS, PENDANTS, RINGS, TOE RINGS, CHAINS, BEAD, WATCHES AND WATCH BANDS | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Silver Moon Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Silver Moon Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named THE TIGGLER THE ORIGINAL VIBRATING BARBELL POWERED BY A TINY DYNAMO TIGGLER HITS THE SPOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 29, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |