USPTO serial 78130584
CRANIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRANIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
EVERETT E FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS SOLD AS A UNIT OR SEPARATELY IN THE FIELD OF TEAM BUILDING, LEADERSHIP AND CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT TRAINING; CALENDARS; BLANK CARDS; NOTEPADS; ORIGAMI SETS COMPRISED OF TISSUE PAPER AND WAX PAPER; SYNTHETIC PAPER; DATE BOOKS; MAGAZINES REGARDING GAMES AND ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES; NEWSLETTERS REGARDING GAMES AND ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES; CROSSWORD PUZZLES; SYNDICATED NEWSPAPER COLUMNS REGARDING GAMES AND ENTERTAINMENT ACTIVITIES; PUZZLES, A SERIES OF BOOKS, FLASH CARD SETS, PRINTED CHARTS, WORKBOOKS, MANUALS, PRINTED TRAINING MATERIALS, NOTE PADS, PRINTED FLIP CHARTS, AND STATIONERY NOTES, ALL FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF TEAM BUILDING, LEADERSHIP AND CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT TRAINING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |