USPTO serial 78130903
RAZOR ALLOYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAZOR ALLOYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT PC16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AUTOMOTIVE WHEELS AND WHEEL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, LUG NUTS, VALVE STEMS, WHEEL LOCKS AND CENTER CAPS | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |