USPTO serial 78131433
THIGHBRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3086035Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2006
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THIGHBRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD M. COHN
HOWARD M COHN HOWARD M COHN LLC21625 CHAGRIN BLVD STE 220CLEVELAND, OH 44122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, A FITNESS PRODUCT THAT TARGETS THE THIGHS, WHICH VIBRATES WHEN PLACED BETWEEN THE KNEES AND PRESSED TOGETHER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |