USPTO serial 78131845
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS AND SERVICES FOR PROCESSING ONLINE EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |