USPTO serial 78132348
AIRPORTCONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AIRPORTCONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
1043 CH Amsterdam (Sloterdijk), NL
Other trademarks owned by SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
1043 CH Amsterdam (Sloterdijk), NL
Other trademarks owned by SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
1043 CH Amsterdam (Sloterdijk), NL
Other trademarks owned by SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
AMSTERDAM (SLOTERDIJK), NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications apparatus and equipment, namely, common user terminals; computer programs used for integrating software applications with existing host computer systems over network, for providing network access, and emulating commands and enquiries sent to multiple host computer systems and acting on responses from than; electronic systems comprised of computer hardware and computer peripherals; [ electronic instruction manuals and newsletters as a unit, both downloadable and recorded-on computerized media; peripheral, or information carriers, namely, per-recorded magnetic computer tapes; ] all of the aforementioned for facilitating the recording, transmitting; reproducing and processing of information relating to baggage handling, the retrieval of passenger records via global distribution systems, and the transportation of passenger and baggage, all for use by or in relation to the airlines, airports, [aerospace, freight, tourism ] and travel industries, governmental, intergovernmental and statutory enterprises and authorities, and the airline reservations, [car rentals, hotel reservation] industries | ACTIVE | May 14, 2003 |
| 035 | [ Business consultation relating to the management of computerized files and operations; data processing services; ] business management; [computerized location and tracking of luggage, freight and goods; rental of office machines and equipment;] providing statistical information for business and commercial purposes; data processing services; business consultation services designed to improve the efficiency of operations and processes for the airline, airport, [aerospace; freight, tourism] and travel industries; governmental, intergovernmental and statutory enterprises and authorities, [airline reservations, car rentals, automatic hotel room and accommodation availability and reservations;] computerized database management namely, the retrieval of computer records via global distribution systems and the transportation of information relating to airline reservation operations, [car rental operations, and automatic room and accommodation availability and reservation operations] | ACTIVE | May 14, 2003 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, the integration of computer systems and networks; computer programming computer systems analysis; rental of computer software; [ technical research in the field of computers; ] consultancy services, namely, computer consultation requiring a high degree of technical expertise and qualification; consultation in the field of computer hardware and software; engineering services; conducting engineering studies [; design for others of computer systems for the airline, airport, aerospace, freight, tourism and travel industries, governmental, intergovernmental and statutory enterprises, airline reservations, car rentals and hotel reservation industries] | ACTIVE | May 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
- Other trademarks owned by SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
- Other trademarks owned by SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING, N. V.
- Other trademarks owned by SITA N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIRPORTCONNECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |