Drawing for VULTUSPASS

USPTO serial 78132357

VULTUSPASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VULTUSPASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC APPARATUS FOR USE IN VERIFYING AND IDENTIFYING PERSON/USERS IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL AUTHENTICATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROCESSING, STORING AND ACCESSING INFORMATION OF FACES IN ORDER TO VERIFY AND IDENTIFY THE PERSONS/USERS IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL AUTHENTICATIONACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 30, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance