USPTO serial 78132377
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Arch Personal Care Products, L.P.
Morristown, NJ
Arch Personal Care Products, L.P.
South Plainfield, NJ
Arch Personal Care Products, L.P.
South Plainfield, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Perry
David M. Perry BLANK ROME LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical additives for use in manufacture of cosmetics, namely, alcohols, aldehydes, alkanolamides, alkanoiamines, alkoxylated alcohols, alkoxylated, amides, alkoxylated amines, alkoxylated carboxylic acids, alkylamido alkylamines, alkyl aryl sulfonates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkyl-substituted amino acids, alkyl sulfates, amides, amine oxides, amines, amino acids, benzophenones, betaines, biological polymers and their derivatives, biological products, carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, color additives, hair color additives, lakes color additives, color additives, essential oils, esters, ethers, fats and oils, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, glyceryl esters and derivatives, halogen compounds, heterocyclic compounds, hydrocarbons, imidazoline compounds, inorganic acids, inorganic bases, inorganic salts, inorganics, isethlonates, ketones, lanolin and lanolin derivatives, organic salts, paba derivatives, phenols, phosphorus compounds, polymeric ethers, polyols, protein derivates, proteins, quatemary ammonlum compounds, sarcosinates and sarcosine derivatives, siloxanes and silanes, soaps, sorbitan derivatives, sterols, sulfonic acids, sulfosuccinates and sulfosuccinates, sulfuric acid esters, synthetic polymers, thio compounds, unsaponiflables, waxes, polypeptides, enzymes, growth factors, cytokinins, yeast extracts, yeast peptones, yeast lysates, microbial enzymes, microbial peptones, all separately promoted and sold as ingredients for the further manufacture of cosmetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |