Drawing for SEA THERAPEUTICS

USPTO serial 78132473

SEA THERAPEUTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEA THERAPEUTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Loren Donald Pearson

Loren Donald Pearson Pearson IP333 SE 2nd AvenueSuite 2000Miami, FL 33131-2185

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, soaps, bath salts, and body spraysACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 27, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 27, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 9, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 6, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 4, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance