USPTO serial 78133213
INTELLICAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLICAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longmont, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon E. R. Troy
GORDON E R TROY GORDON E R TROY, PCP O BOX 368CHARLOTTE, VT 05445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized database management services in the field of emergency support information not related to weather; Computerized database management services in the field of emergency support, coordination, call generation and voice messaging not related to weather; Computerized database management services in the field of storing, retrieving and maintaining updatable databases by individuals, public service agencies and companies to maintain relevant information for use in delivering prerecorded messages to a predetermined list of potential recipients not related to weather | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Notification services, namely, transmittal of notifications of disasters, calamities and/or broad scale emergencies not related to weather via telephone, cable television, wireless telecommunications and data communications, satellite and global computer networks; Communication services, namely electronic communication and information systems that facilitate access to and use of emergency information by emergency administration personnel, public service access providers, public safety agencies, and commercial firms providing emergency services not related to weather; communication services, namely, delivering a pre-recorded voice message not related to weather, via telephone, wireless telecommunications, satellite and global computer networks, to a pre-determined list of contacts; telecommunications gateway services not related to weather; call generation and voice messaging not related to weather; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages not related to weather by telephone, wireless telecommunications, satellite and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |