USPTO serial 78133578
ANGELIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANGELIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | active wear, namely, leotards, sweat suits, leggings, sportswear, namely, cardigans, and excluding uniforms, clothing and accessories sold for use in institutions, service industries, or professional business establishments, or sold through employer-sponsored programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PGDV | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |