Drawing for OKINAWA DIET

USPTO serial 78133950

OKINAWA DIET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OKINAWA DIET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlen L. Olsen

ARLEN L OLSEN SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS22 CENTURY HILL DR STE 302LATHAM, NY 12110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Aseptic foods, namely, dairy products, puddings and processed potatoesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 30, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 17, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 10, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance