USPTO serial 78134399
ASTRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASTRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Kusner
MARK KUSNER KUSNER & JAFFE6151 WILSON MILLS RD STE 310HIGHLAND PLHIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-2128Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuits, semiconductors and microprocessors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 20, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |