USPTO serial 78134828
E-BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Anthony Rolfe
ROBERT F GAZDZINSKI GAZDZINSKI & ASSOCIATES11440 W BERNARDO CT STE 375SAN DIEGO, CA 92127UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BURGLAR ALARMS; CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERAS, VIDEO AND SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS; [VIDEO MONITORS; VIDEO SYSTEMS, NAMELY DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS, DIGITAL DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS COMPRISED OF DISK DRIVES, OPTICAL STORAGE DEVICES CD-ROM DRIVES, AND RAID SYSTEMS, AND TIME-LAPSE DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS FOR USE WITH CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION OR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING VIDEO CAMERAS, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, MULTIPLEX ERS, QUADS, VIDEO CAMERA CONTROLLERS, MATRIX SWITCHERS; FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER CONTROL OVER CLOSED CIRCUIT CAMERAS AND VIDEO CAMERAS, ACCESS AND SECURITY SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |