USPTO serial 78136529
BUMPY FACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUMPY FACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Carlino
MARK A CARLINO LAW OFFICE OF MARK A. CARLINO, PC10115 E BELL RD STE 107 PMB 601SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Make-up kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss, lip liner, lip balm, blush, foundation, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, concealer, cosmetic pencils, and facial powder; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip gloss, lip liner, non-medicated lip balm, blush, foundation, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, concealer, cosmetic pencils, and facial powder; fragrances, namely, perfume, cologne, and after-shave; non-medicated skin care products, namely, soap, scrubs, toner, conditioner, exfoliators, skin clarifier, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, and moisturizer; face and body lotion, cream, oil, gel and spray; sun screen preparations, namely, lotion, cream, gel, and spray; non-medicated face and body skin lightener; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, rinse, gel, mousse, spray and tonic; bath care products, namely, soap, non-medicated bath salts, crystals, beads, gel, oil, powder, and bubble bath; scented head-to-toe body wash; nail care preparations, namely, cuticle cream, cuticle removing preparations, nail enamel, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, and nail strengtheners; personal deodorant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |