USPTO serial 78137308
VERIFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2861305Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2004
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERIFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Columbia, MD
Columbia, MD
Columbia, MD
WEST CHESTER, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig K. Leon
CRAIG K. LEON W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN.7500 GRACE DRIVECOLUMBIA, MD 21044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ CHEMICAL ADDITIVES AND ADMIXTURES IN THE FORM OF FIBERS, FIBER BUNDLES, PARTICULATES, VISCOUS FLUIDS, OR MIXTURES THEREOF FOR USE IN CONCRETE, MASONRY, MORTAR, SHOTCRETE, GYPSUM, CEMENT, OR OTHER MATRIX MATERIALS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2002 |
| 007 | MACHINES FOR PUMPING DISPENSING, FLOWING, OR DELIVERING VISCOUS LIQUID ADDITIVES OR ADMIXTURES, INCLUDING FIBER-CONTAINING FLUIDS, FOR CEMENT OR CONCRETE MANUFACTURING | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2002 |
| 009 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR PUMPING, DISPENSING, FLOWING, OR DELIVERING VISCOUS LIQUID ADDITIVES OR ADMIXTURES, INCLUDING FIBER-CONTAINING FLUIDS, IN THE CEMENT OR CONCRETE INDUSTRY | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
- Other trademarks owned by W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
- Other trademarks owned by W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
- Other trademarks owned by VERIFI LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VERIFI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 18, 2012 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |