USPTO serial 78137907
DORNIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2006
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DORNIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124-5273UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | May 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DORNIER, CHRISTOPH
- Other trademarks owned by DORNIER, CHRISTOPH
- Other trademarks owned by ESTATE OF THE LATE CHRISTOPH DORNIER C/O RA ANDREA HODEL
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named DORNIER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |