USPTO serial 78145192
AIR SPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3382663Status 780Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2008
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AIR SPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Waltham, MA
WALTHAM, MA
WALTHAM, MA
Centennial, CA
CARLSBAD, CA
CARLSBAD, CA
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
Waltham, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLEMENT CHENG
CLEMENT CHENG NEWHOPE LAW, PC4522 KATELLA AVE 200LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | shoes, sneakers, walking shoes, running shoes, jogging shoes, athletic shoes, hiking shoes; clothing, namely, t-shirts, pants, caps, hats, shirts, sweatshirts | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meynard Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MEYNARD DESIGNS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MEYNARD DESIGNS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IN CALIFORNIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IN CALIFORNIA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IN CALIFORNIA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KIMERA INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Meynard Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AIR SPEED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2024 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2023 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |