USPTO serial 78146919
TANREI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANREI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer, fruit-flavored soft drinks, fruit-based soft drinks with tea, soft drinks, fruit juices, vegetable juices, whey beverages, extracts of hops for making beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |