Drawing for VENTUS NETWORKS

USPTO serial 78150806

VENTUS NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENTUS NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH CHARETTE

KEITH CHARETTE VENTUS NETWORKS1ST FL W800 CONNECTICUT AVENORWALK, CT 06854

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services and wholesale distributorships featuring telecommunications and computer hardwareACTIVE
038Telecommunications consultation; telecommunications reseller services, namely providing long distance telecommunication services, providing fiber optical network services, ISDN services, and telecommunications gateway servicesACTIVE
042Computer network design for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Feb 17, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 17, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance