CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EZ-CONTROL

USPTO serial 78151158

EZ-CONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2931588Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2005
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EZ-CONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott K. Haight

Scott K. Haight Law Office of Scott K. Haight8930 Calumet CoveGermantown, TN 38138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for collaboratively managing procurement, production planning and inventory control in the supply chain for the publication, catalog, print and related paper industriesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 21, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 30, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 9, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 14, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 11, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 13, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 9, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 8, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 13, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 14, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 31, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 31, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 20, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance