USPTO serial 78151445
COLORSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLORSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-64293 Darmstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. John Campaign
GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | TECHNICAL STYLING ASSISTANCE WITH DETAILED INFORMATION ON HOW TO USE COLORSTREAM PIGMENTS EFFECTIVELY IN COLOR FORMULATIONS IN DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN VARIOUS FIELDS, NAMELY, AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN, FASHION DESIGN, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, PACKAGING DESIGN, FURNITURE DESIGN, TWO-WHEELER DESIGN, AEROSPACE DESIGN, MARINE DESIGN, SPORT ARTICLES DESIGN, PLASTICS DESIGN, COSMETIC DESIGN AND CERAMICS DESIGN, SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDING PRINTING SERVICES, PRINTING AND GRAPHIC ART DESIGN SERVICES AND DESKTOP PUBLISHING FOR OTHERS; CONSULTATION SERVICES REGARDING AUTOMOBILE DESIGN AND AUTOMOBILE INTERIOR DECORATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |