USPTO serial 78152679
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Peronne, FR
Peronne, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
COLLEN IP TOWN OF OSSININGTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEWESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY 10562| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textile fabric for the manufacture of clothing; fabric strengthening pieces for use in strengthening fabrics used in further manufacture; textile lining for clothing; Stiffening fabric with canvas pieces for use in stiffening fabrics used in the clothing industry; Thermo-adhesive stiffening fabric with canvas pieces for use in thermo-adhesive stiffening fabrics used in the clothing industry; Thermo-adhesive stiffening fabric without canvas pieces for use in thermo-adhesive stiffening fabrics used in the clothing industry; fabric shirt fronts and prefabricated stiffening fabric with canvas for clothing pieces for use in prefabricated stiffening fabrics used in the clothing industry; adhesive fabrics for application by heat for use in manufacture of clothing and curtains; chenille fabric; crepe cloth; damask; moleskin; jersey material; jute cloth; woolen cloth; linen cloth; silk cloth; non-woven textile fabrics; elastic woven material; fiberglass fabrics for textile use; gummed cloth, other than for stationery; pillow ticks, namely, cloth cases for pillows; fabric of imitation animal skins; taffeta cloth; bed and table covers; oil cloth for use as tablecloths | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |