USPTO serial 78154963
WOODWELDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2008
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WOODWELDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samir S. Khoury
Samir S. Khoury Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP38210 Glenn AvenueWilloughby, OH 44094-7808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Ultrasonic machines for processing porous material, namely, machines for joining objects of porous materials using ultrasonic radiation; vibration generating machines for processing porous material, namely, machines for joining objects of porous material using vibration; power-operated handheld devices, namely, handheld ultrasonic tools, for joining objects of porous material by means of ultrasound, handheld devices, namely, handheld ultrasonic tools, for joining objects of porous material by means of vibration | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Prefabricated plastic elements, namely, joining elements consisting of thermoplastic polymer material for joining objects of porous material in the nature of wood used in carpentry and furniture manufacture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |